Wednesday, 24 April 2019 17:39

Revolution in the air

Is it time to change the rules for international arbitration? Nearly 30 countries believe it is – but the new rules they have proposed have caused controversy with some lawyers in Spain saying they will lead to worry and uncertainty for clients.

The world of international arbitration could be set for a revolution. For the last twenty years, many international arbitration practitioners have been applying the International Bar Association (IBA) rules on the taking of evidence in international arbitration in their cases. The IBA rules – which are often thought of as a compromise between civil law and common law traditions – are commonly adopted as a benchmark for dealing with evidence and oral hearings. But now a challenge to this approach has emerged. Last year, on the 14th of December, a working group formed by representatives from 29 countries – predominantly civil law jurisdictions, such as Russia, Slovenia, Ukraine and the Czech Republic – launched ‘Rules on the Efficient Conduct of Proceedings in International Arbitration’, known as the “Prague Rules”. This new set of rules is designed to offer an alternative to the IBA Rules and promote procedural efficiency in international arbitration, in order to reduce its time and cost. However, many professionals are not convinced that the new rules will be effective.

SOURCE OF THE PROBLEM


Efficiency has been a buzzword in international arbitration for a number of years. “For a long time, arbitration practitioners have been discussing the possible tools to reduce the duration and the cost related to international arbitration”, says Laurence Shore, partner and leader of the International Arbitration department at the Italian law firm BonelliErede. “The Prague Rules proponents believe that proceedings have become extremely lengthy and expensive – they identify the source of the problem as the extensive document production, the numerous witnesses called by the parties, as well as the oral hearings featuring cross-examination of witnesses,” he explains. One of the key features of arbitration is that, unlike litigation, it may, to a large extent, be shaped in accordance with the will and needs of the parties. However, nowadays, many clients are worried about how much they are spending on cases and how long it takes to get a result. Although it is not easy to estimate the duration of arbitral proceedings, in general a commercial arbitration could last between 12 and 18 months, according to Shore. “Even though arbitration is quicker than most court proceedings, 12 to 18 months to reach a decision could be considered not good enough to meet the parties’ need for a quick and efficient solution of the dispute.” Costs are also difficult to determine because they depend on the complexity and value of the dispute. Clients’ expenses are usually related to the costs of the legal counsel preparing the case – which constitute the main portion of parties’ expenses – the costs of the arbitrators, as well as the fees of the arbitral institution administering the case. “The Prague Rules proponents believe that entrusting the arbitrators with a more active role will help reduce the costs of the arbitral proceedings,” Shore says. However, despite the concerns expressed about the arbitral process, international arbitration is still a very vibrant and growing area. “These complaints do not seem to have discouraged the parties from choosing arbitration,” Shore says. “Given the complexity of some cases, especially in cross border disputes, arbitration is the only real option – additionally, there are more high value cases going to arbitration than 15 years ago and a wider range of industries that resort to arbitral tribunals, everything is more complicated now.”

LIMITING WITNESSES

In this context, the drafters of the Prague Rules believe that, by adopting procedures more akin to a civil law inquisitorial style, procedural efficiency in international arbitration will be enhanced. Indeed, the working group has identified three features of evidence taking in arbitration which are largely responsible for the time and costs of arbitration proceedings: excessive document production requests, too many witnesses, and lengthy hearings featuring cross examination.

To read the article in full, please download the magazine here

banner gold awards2019

banner latam awards2019

The Latin American Lawyer
N.8 • July 15, 2019

LAL8 20190715 EN
 

Iberian Lawyer
N.86 • July 02, 2019

IL86 Cover SP IL86 Cover EN
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31

This website uses cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the IberianLawyer website. However, you can change your cookie settings at any time. Learn more

I agree

What do I need to know about cookies?

A cookie is a small text file that’s stored on your computer or mobile device when you visit a website. We use them to:

  • Remember your preferences
  • Tailor our sites to your interests.

There are different types of cookies

First party cookies

These are set by the website you’re visiting. And only that website can read them.  In addition, a website might use a separate company to analyse how people are using their site. And this separate company will set their own cookie to do this.

Third party cookies

These are set by someone other than the owner of the website you’re visiting. 

Some IberianLawyer web pages may also contain content from other sites like Vimeo or Flickr, which may set their own cookies. Also, if you Share a link to a IberianLawyer page, the service you share it on (e.g. Facebook) may set a cookie on your browser.

The IberianLawyer has no control over third party cookies.

Advertising cookies

Some websites use advertising networks to show you specially targeted adverts when you visit. These networks may also be able to track your browsing across different sites.

IberianLawyer site do use advertising cookies but they won’t track your browsing outside the IberianLawyer.

Session cookies

These are stored while you’re browsing. They get deleted from your device when you close your browser e.g. Internet Explorer or Safari.

Persistent cookies

These are saved on your computer. So they don’t get deleted when you close your browser.

We use persistent cookies when we need to know who you are for more than one browsing session. For example, we use them to remember your preferences for the next time you visit.

Other tracking technologies

Some sites use things like web beacons, clear GIFs, page tags and web bugs to understand how people are using them and target advertising at people.

They usually take the form of a small, transparent image, which is embedded in a web page or email. They work with cookies and capture data like your IP address, when you viewed the page or email, what device you were using and where you were.

How does the Iberian Lawyer use cookies?

We use different types of cookies for different things, such as:

  • Analysing how you use the IberianLawyer
  • Giving you a better, more personalised experience
  • Recognising when you’ve signed in

Strictly Necessary cookies

These cookies let you use all the different parts of Iberian Lawyer. Without them services that you have asked for cannot be provided.

Some examples of how we use these cookies are:

  • Signing into the IberianLawyer
  • Remembering previous actions such as text entered into a registration form when navigating back to a page in the same session
  • Remembering security settings which restrict access to certain content.

Performance cookies

These help us understand how people are using the IberianLawyer online, so we can make it better. And they let us try out different ideas.
We sometimes get other companies to analyse how people are using the IberianLawyer online. These companies may set their own performance cookies You can opt out of these cookies here.Some examples of how we use these cookies are:

  • To collect information about which web pages visitors go to most often so we can improve the online experience
  • Error management to make sure that the website is working properly
  • Testing designs to help improve the look and feel of the website.
Cookie nameWhat it's for
Google DoubleClick The IberianLawyer uses Google DoubleClick to measure the effectiveness of its online marketing campaigns.Opt-out of DoubleClick cookies
Google Analytics From time to time some IberianLawyer online services, including mobile apps, use Google Analytics. This is a web analytics service provided by Google, Inc. Google Analytics sets a cookie in order to evaluate use of those services and compile a report for us.Opt-out of Google Analytics cookies