Tuesday, 02 January 2018 15:36

Arbitrators ‘excessively cautious’ when making awards

Perceived risk of decisions being challenged means arbitrators are driven to issuing watertight rulings, but critics says few awards are actually annulled and a bolder approach should be adopted

Some arbitrators are being excessively cautious when ruling on cases because of the perception that there is a growing risk of awards being challenged, participants at a recent masterclass hosted by Iberian Lawyer, in association with Wolters Kluwer, in Miami heard.
Attendees – who included arbitration counsel, arbitrators and other dispute resolution experts – called for arbitrators to be more courageous in making efforts to teach parties that arbitrators need to be respected and develop a better understanding of why they make certain decisions. Arbitrators were also urged to be bolder when making decisions, with attendees pointing out that few awards are annulled at present due to procedural issues.
Opinions were divided with regards to the issue of what should be deemed acceptable in terms of the time limits imposed on parties and procedures for the submission of documents. It was argued that because some arbitrators do not prepare sufficiently, they accept everything, and allow too much time for submissions in the name of respecting due process. Participants also said arbitrators should be patient and prepared to have reasonable grounds to support their decision to deny the submission of certain evidence, and have a clear understanding of what is called for with regard to the facts of the case.
Attendees said it was wrong to delay proceedings at one party´s request as the rights of the other party might not be taken into account. Rules are there to be enforced, and arbitrators should not accept new arguments which are no longer relevant in the proceedings. There is a pressing need to find ways of holding parties, or their counsel, accountable for unjustifiably delaying proceedings, attendees agreed.

Striking a balance
A balance needs to be found between aggressive tribunals trying to achieve cost effective arbitrations and more conservative ones that tend to aim for non-challengeable awards. While awards made by tribunals sitting in Paris or New York are rarely annulled because of due process issues and the fact that arbitrators are able to enforce rules more effectively, in other parts of the world standards are not the same, attendees said. Arbitrators might experience intimidation from counsel, parties and even authorities in certain jurisdictions. This leads to tribunals generally being more prudent because they are primarily concerned with securing enforceable and non-challengeable awards with overall uncertainty increasing the perception of risk. Achieving a careful balance could ensure that all parties are heard, as well as meaning national courts will be reassured that due process was not inhibited in any way.
Participants were told that, in some cases, it seems arbitrators might adhere too rigidly to the rules of the seat or the institution, rules which can be helpful when explaining tribunal decisions to the parties involved. The International Chamber of Commerce Arbitration Court has published some guidelines which allow for flexibility in some particular frameworks, and grant more powers to arbitrators. The International Bar Association has also issued some guiding principles which help arbitrators apply rules flexibly depending on the circumstances, while ensuring parties do not obstruct proceedings unnecessarily.

Event: Due process in arbitration: a shield or a sword?
Location: Miami, Florida, USA
In collaboration with: Wolters Kluwer
Moderator: Carolyn Lamm, White & Case

Last modified on Tuesday, 02 January 2018 15:39
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
1
2
3
4
7
8
9
10
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
22
23
24
25
27
28
29
30
   

Click image

This website uses cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the IberianLawyer website. However, you can change your cookie settings at any time. Learn more

I agree

What do I need to know about cookies?

A cookie is a small text file that’s stored on your computer or mobile device when you visit a website. We use them to:

  • Remember your preferences
  • Tailor our sites to your interests.

There are different types of cookies

First party cookies

These are set by the website you’re visiting. And only that website can read them.  In addition, a website might use a separate company to analyse how people are using their site. And this separate company will set their own cookie to do this.

Third party cookies

These are set by someone other than the owner of the website you’re visiting. 

Some IberianLawyer web pages may also contain content from other sites like Vimeo or Flickr, which may set their own cookies. Also, if you Share a link to a IberianLawyer page, the service you share it on (e.g. Facebook) may set a cookie on your browser.

The IberianLawyer has no control over third party cookies.

Advertising cookies

Some websites use advertising networks to show you specially targeted adverts when you visit. These networks may also be able to track your browsing across different sites.

IberianLawyer site do use advertising cookies but they won’t track your browsing outside the IberianLawyer.

Session cookies

These are stored while you’re browsing. They get deleted from your device when you close your browser e.g. Internet Explorer or Safari.

Persistent cookies

These are saved on your computer. So they don’t get deleted when you close your browser.

We use persistent cookies when we need to know who you are for more than one browsing session. For example, we use them to remember your preferences for the next time you visit.

Other tracking technologies

Some sites use things like web beacons, clear GIFs, page tags and web bugs to understand how people are using them and target advertising at people.

They usually take the form of a small, transparent image, which is embedded in a web page or email. They work with cookies and capture data like your IP address, when you viewed the page or email, what device you were using and where you were.

How does the Iberian Lawyer use cookies?

We use different types of cookies for different things, such as:

  • Analysing how you use the IberianLawyer
  • Giving you a better, more personalised experience
  • Recognising when you’ve signed in

Strictly Necessary cookies

These cookies let you use all the different parts of Iberian Lawyer. Without them services that you have asked for cannot be provided.

Some examples of how we use these cookies are:

  • Signing into the IberianLawyer
  • Remembering previous actions such as text entered into a registration form when navigating back to a page in the same session
  • Remembering security settings which restrict access to certain content.

Performance cookies

These help us understand how people are using the IberianLawyer online, so we can make it better. And they let us try out different ideas.
We sometimes get other companies to analyse how people are using the IberianLawyer online. These companies may set their own performance cookies You can opt out of these cookies here.Some examples of how we use these cookies are:

  • To collect information about which web pages visitors go to most often so we can improve the online experience
  • Error management to make sure that the website is working properly
  • Testing designs to help improve the look and feel of the website.
Cookie nameWhat it's for
Google DoubleClick The IberianLawyer uses Google DoubleClick to measure the effectiveness of its online marketing campaigns.Opt-out of DoubleClick cookies
Google Analytics From time to time some IberianLawyer online services, including mobile apps, use Google Analytics. This is a web analytics service provided by Google, Inc. Google Analytics sets a cookie in order to evaluate use of those services and compile a report for us.Opt-out of Google Analytics cookies